A different way of working
In times of economic growth, there is a tendency to achieve increases in scale through acquisitions. The economic recession causes companies to adjust to new market circumstances. But how?
A summary of a few of the core risks:
| VAT paid (AP) | Examples |
|---|---|
| VAT paid to suppliers is not reported or is deducted. | VAT on expenses (e.g. hotel) or VAT booked under tax code upon import. |
| VAT paid to suppliers is reported on the incorrect VAT return. | Request for a German VAT repayment in a Dutch return. |
| Improper AP processes for which the wrong VAT treatment is selected. | Selection of the wrong tax code. |
| Additional VAT payment because the invoice does not satisfy the invoice requirements. | Wrong name, address, VAT identification number. |
| Additional VAT payment is deducted where no right to deduction exists. | Company outings, meals and drinks, facilities for personnel |
| VAT deduction is not supported by sufficient evidence. | Invoices are missing in the administration. |
| Improper reporting of pass-through VAT | Not reporting pass-through VAT or incorrect rate |
| VAT deduction could have taken place at an earlier moment. | Invoice gets booked late due to long approval process. Invoices not selected in filing return. |
| Late payment of VAT repayment requests. | Start ups, foreign VAT repayments or non-functioning internal processes. |
| VAT owed (AR) | Examples |
|---|---|
| VAT charged is not remitted. | No invoices are issued with respect to inter-company transactions (outside the physical unity). |
| (Credit) invoices issued do not satisfy legal requirements. | No/incorrect text on the invoice for 0% VAT or wrong VAT number. |
| Wrong VAT treatment applied to services performed. | Incorrect VAT rate, wrong qualification of service (exemption). |
| Insufficient evidence in administration for the VAT treatment applied. | No transport documentation for 0% rate VAT intra-EU community transactions and export. |
| VAT owed was corrected improperly based on uncollectible receivables. | Not all conditions are satisfied for the type of refund. |
| Incorrect pricing due to the application of lower VAT rate that can no longer be corrected. | When selling to individuals/consumers |
| VAT must be paid to the tax authority sooner than it is received from the customer. | Is cash flow optimization possible? |
| Refund of VAT owed on uncollectible receivables is not requested. | Uncollectible receivables are entered with the incorrect tax code. |
| Indirect tax functionality in systems | Examples |
|---|---|
| Tax code structure is improperly configured or too few tax codes are included. | Not all relevant tax codes are replaced upon a change of rate (e.g. for tax codes with pass-through VAT). |
| Relevant knowledge of VAT is missing when structuring master data and maintenance. | No approval by tax during the process of master data creation or maintenance. |
| Too little information relevant to VAT in customer and supplier master data. | No/incorrect VAT numbers |
| The system determines the wrong VAT treatment. | Incorrect logic in the VAT conditions tables; incorrect use of partner functions in ERP. |
| System does not support the VAT filing process, resulting in manual processes and the use of Excel. | Consolidation of the fiscal VAT unit in Excel with the risk of errors. |